All the reasons you might not have gotten that job

Many of which have nothing to do with you.

Man sitting in small working space with laptop looking frustrated
Photo by Tim Gouw on Unsplash

Not every job that is posted publicly is intended to be filled by an external candidate.

This fact is surprising to many who are early in their careers, who assume that every job posting has a 1:1 correlation to someone being hired from outside the organization. Just because a job is posted doesn’t mean that the company that published it has a position to be filled by an external candidate. The following four reasons are why jobs can be posted, and no one gets an interview.

1. The job was destined for an internal transfer or contractor conversion

Many companies have rules about having to post jobs externally for ten days before offering the job to an internal candidate or converting an individual from contractor to employee status. This rule is especially true for companies that involve unions (where the posting requirement is part of the collective bargaining agreement) or federal contractors. Some other large companies have voluntarily adopted these rules for transparency in hiring decisions.

2. The posting was “evergreen.”

Evergreen postings are so-called because they are postings that never die. Evergreen postings are typically used by larger companies where there is a reasonably continuous need for people with a particular skill set, but not an actual open position. If an outstanding candidate comes through the door, talent acquisition is then supposed to align that candidate with a real available position. But many people who apply to evergreen requisitions never hear back because their submission was not aligned to an actual open position. Sometimes evergreen postings can be detected by:

3. The posting was purely for visa reasons.

Some visa statuses under certain circumstances necessitate the employer to prove that US candidates have been solicited for the job and that none of the US candidates satisfy the job requirements. These types of postings are sometimes detectable by the minute detail contained in the job description as if they were being crafted with a single individual in mind. That makes it easier for the employer to say that no one except the candidate who needs the visa was qualified for the job.

4. The job was posted to get local compensation information.

There are many job categories (mostly ones in high demand) where compensation fluctuates frequently. Employers who need people in that category need to make sure that they are paying their current employees in the right range, lest those employees leave for greener grass. I have heard of employers posting jobs and conducting “screening interviews” to find out what people outside of the organization are currently being paid for similar roles. That type of inquiry is getting more difficult as an increasing number of states are making it illegal to inquire about current compensation. However, asking what an employee’s salary *expectations* are is still legal.

You applied too late in the cycle.

You may have applied the day you found the posting, but if the requisition has already been up for 21 days or longer, chances are they already have many qualified candidates in the pipeline. Unless they all fall through, talent acquisition may not be going back to the new resumes that have arrived since they started doing interviews.

You were “the diversity interview.”

Many companies (my employer included) require a “diversity interview” before allowing jobs to be offered to non-diverse candidates. At VMware, we do not waste people’s time by bringing people in for interviews when they have no chance of getting an offer. But some companies have been known for doing this shameful practice. If you belong to an underrepresented minority — it is evident in your name, your resume, or your internet presence — it is possible that you only received the interview so the employer could check that box. Unfortunately, they may have intended to make the offer to the non-diverse candidate all along.

The job was a stretch for your skillset

This particular reason impacts men and women very differently. A recent HBR article summarizes HP's research that demonstrates a significant gap between men and women with respect to applications and job qualifications. Women tend not to apply for jobs unless they are 100% qualified, whereas men apply when they are 60% qualified. So men are more likely to apply for jobs that are a stretch, and thus are more likely to be rejected for lack of qualifications.

Your resume wasn’t aligned with the employer’s ATS system or the ATS system rules were biased

98 % of companies use Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in the talent acquisition funnel, all the way from the application to the final selection of a single winning candidate. 75 % of applications are rejected without a human ever looking at either the resume or the cover letter.

  • To get the interview, you have to pass the screening.
  • To pass the screening, you have to get past the ATS.
  • Avoid resume gaps. If you do have a gap in your official employment history, fill it in and talk about what you did during that time.
  • Don’t use multiple columns, fancy formating, or ornate fonts. The information contained in any of those may never make it into the ATS.
  • Submitting a well-prepared video with the application
  • Have a publicly visible brand associated with your name by building your presence via LinkedIn, blogging, or a professional website.
  • Volunteering in the area that you are seeking a job in, at bootcamps, or with non-profits.

Blogger, disability advocate, nerd. Bringing the fire on ableism. A11y Architect @ VMware. Wheelchair user w/ a deaf daughter. CS, Law, and Business background

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store